Template talk:Infobox Unicode block: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Related blocks: new section
Line 42:
: Same here but couldn't decide on formatting and if it should be next by code point range, next by block name, or both. [[User:Drmccreedy|DRMcCreedy]] ([[User talk:Drmccreedy|talk]]) 21:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
:: Well, personally I've only been interested in neighboring blocks by codepoint. I don't know why one would want to find the next or previous block by alphabetic order, because that is often meaningless: for instance, [[Basic Latin (Unicode block)|Basic Latin]] borders [[Bamum Supplement]] and [[Bassa Vah (Unicode block)|Bassa Vah]]. What would be more useful is links to other blocks that contain characters in the same script: Basic Latin, Latin-1 Supplement, Latin Extended-A, Latin Extended-B, Latin Extended Additional, Latin Extended-C, Latin Extended-D, Latin Extended-E. — [[User:Erutuon|Eru]]·[[User talk:Erutuon|tuon]] 00:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 
== Related blocks ==
 
In [[Early Dynastic Cuneiform (Unicode block)]], {{U|Theknightwho }} added this hatnote:
{{also|Cuneiform (Unicode block)|Cuneiform Numbers and Punctuation|l2=Cuneiform Numbers and Punctuation (Unicode block)}}
 
While being GF, and a good idea, I have removed it [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Early_Dynastic_Cuneiform_(Unicode_block)&diff=1074116005&oldid=1074109445&diffmode=source] with es
:{{mono|1="rm 'see also' hatnote (goodfaith): obviously content related, so should be in article body (infobox? See also section?)"}}.
 
Now I am here to propose such addition to article content.
*'''Proposal 1''': in Infobox subsection, for content-related Unicode blocks, add {{para|related blocks}} to list these. For example:
{{left|1={{infobox
|abovestyle=background:#CCE;
|above = Early Dynastic Cuneiform
|headerstyle=background:#E6E6FF;
|header20=Related Unicode blocks
|data21={{ubl
|[[Cuneiform (Unicode block)|Cuneiform]]
|[[Cuneiform Numbers and Punctuation (Unicode block)|Cuneiform Numbers and Punctuation]]}}
}}}}
{{clear}}
It will require discipline, from this intention, to limit the to content-related (ie, limit to same script, or same symbol set).
 
-[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 09:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)