Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Guy Macon: Should I assume from the lack of a response that the committee has decided to reject my advice and copy what was written in 2011, or should I keep asking? |
|||
Line 100:
== Comments by Guy Macon ==
Re: ▼
:"...and may not make requests to change mainspace pages using such sources."▼
There is an overwhelming community consensus to welcome such requests by COI editors (for example, '''"Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or in your user space"''' from [[WP:PSCOI]]).▼
Why is ''this'' case of possible COI being treated so differently? --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 12:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)▼
----▼
On another topic, see [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Skeptical Inquirer at Arbcom]]. --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 06:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)▼
:...and someone created an RfC on the same page. --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 17:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
----▼
Re:
Line 117 ⟶ 132:
::Given the rise in COI editing by people selling Covid cures, magic cancer pills, and ancient medicines that put little girls in the hospital with kidney failure,[https://indianjnephrol.org/article.asp?issn=0971-4065;year=2013;volume=23;issue=4;spage=301;epage=303;aulast=Sathe] might I suggest carefully choosing the wording of this FoF rather than just copying what was written in 2011? --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 06:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
:::Should I assume from the lack of a response that the committee has decided to reject my advice and copy what was written in 2011, or should I keep asking? --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 17:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
▲----
▲On another topic, see [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Skeptical Inquirer at Arbcom]]. --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 06:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
▲----
▲Re:
▲:"...and may not make requests to change mainspace pages using such sources."
▲There is an overwhelming community consensus to welcome such requests by COI editors (for example, '''"Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or in your user space"''' from [[WP:PSCOI]]).
▲Why is ''this'' case of possible COI being treated so differently? --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 12:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
== Comments by BilledMammal ==
| |||