Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:52, 28 February 2022

Revision as of 02:13, 28 February 2022

Line 69:

::::Just to clarify, from evidence I submitted: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rp2006&curid=51412895&diff=1066569173&oldid=1066342021&diffmode=source 18 Jan 22], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thomas_John_(medium)&diff=1065276966&oldid=1065268496&diffmode=source 12 Jan 22], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_John_(medium)&diff=1053756272&oldid=1039453572&diffmode=source 5 Nov 21]. The 5 Nov 21 diff is during the big Havana Syndrome thread at ANI, and directly re-adds a BLPvio that should probably have been revdelled. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_John_(medium)&diff=1022941474&oldid=1022755136&diffmode=source This] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_John_(medium)&diff=1022941609&oldid=1022941474&diffmode=source this] were my removals of the BLPvio, where I outline in the edit summary {{tq|undue and BLP violating. No felony conviction mentioned in sources... Removing BLP violating prose that is not in sources. No source for felony conviction, no source for sentencing date. remove repetition of the same information in the same paragraph.}} I don't think a reminder of "Hey, don't do that," would be out of line, especially as the ACS reminder is based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sharon_A._Hill&diff=next&oldid=1060656391&diffmode=source these] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:A._C._Santacruz&diff=next&oldid=1060575945&diffmode=source two] diffs in evidence. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 11:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

:If you're looking for a better fit than a topic ban, a reminder to observe the best practices in outlined in [[WP:COI]] might be what you're looking for. No topic bans, just use edit requests for edits you have a COI with, and disclosure. That allows the good editing in the topic area to continue unabated, isn't really a sanction, and addresses the FoF. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 19:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

::So despite two findings of fact related to editor COI, there will be no remedies related to them? [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 01:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)