Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Comments by Guy Macon: Looks like fixing the username typo doesn't send a notification unless the timestamp changes. :( |
→Comments by Guy Macon: re RfC to Guy |
||
Line 184:
Please update the finding of fact to reflect "There seemed to be no community consensus on its general reliability" no longer being a fact. --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 16:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
:The FoF is true. When this case closes there will be no community consensus on its general reliability. However you are obviously correct that there's a reasonable chance it would become quickly outdated if the RfC finds consensus other than "no consensus" and so I have added a sentence noting that RfC for people who read this case in the future. Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 16:17, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
== Comments by BilledMammal ==
| |||