Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:24, 28 February 2022

Revision as of 17:31, 28 February 2022

Line 301:

I do not dispute that, I just want to mention [[Narendra Dabholkar]], who did not live in one of those "most places" and was assassinated nine years ago. Outing an anonymous Indian or Pakistani skeptic may paint a target on their back. In other places, skeptics only risk financial ruin by frivolous lawsuits from quacks who can afford them. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]])

:Fair enough. Either way, we presumably agree that the proposed principle should be rejected. &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 17:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

== Comments by {username} ==