Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Tryptofish: Reply |
→Comments by Tryptofish: Reply |
||
Line 274:
::::Oh, I see, I midunderstood{{snd}}you aren't asking us to interpret PS to include all skepticism-related stuff; instead you just to include a reminder that PS DS is available where previously authorized. That's OK with me, though I'm not sure how much value that would add. Pinging co-drafters {{U|Izno}} and {{U|Barkeep49}} for any thoughts. Best, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 19:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::I don't see value to adding a reminder at this time, since that regime is clearly known about. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 19:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
::::::And, by its inclusion here, it would implicitly endorse the use of PSDS for this topic area. I am not a fan of an implicit endorsement. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 19:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
== Comments by 2601:647:5800:1A1F:50AB:FFB9:DD80:EFC5 ==
| |||