Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tryptofish (talk | contribs) →Comments by Tryptofish: reply, (and OMG, I'm changing the indent of an Arb's post!) |
|||
Line 277:
::::::And, by its inclusion here, it would implicitly endorse the use of PSDS for this topic area. I am not a fan of an implicit endorsement. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 19:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::::I can understand that. My thinking is that some parties to the case had explicitly said that they didn't realize that PSDS applied (even though {{u|Wugapodes}} had said so explicitly in a discussion close). But this is probably a matter mostly of editors who are already following the case, and presumably they know about it now from reading the case pages. I'll ping {{u|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, in case they want to comment about it. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 19:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
::::::::My read from the start has been that while this it taking place in the topic area of pseudoscience, pseudoscience is not actually at the heart of the issues we've identified. We have evidence of misconduct around [[WP:BLP]] and so the reminder (and awareness expectation) seems useful. There is no similar statement in the FoF around misconduct of the kind that pseudoscience DS is designed to mitigate. This is no doubt in part because of the scope of the case, but that scope came about because there was enough going on in this case without laying a full re-examination of pseudoscience on top of it. So for me I'm a no on the reminder because it's not a logical outgrowth of what we examined here. [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 19:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::::::OK, with that, and with SFR's reply above, that's good enough for me. I consider ''all'' of the points that I've raised here to have been appropriately addressed. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 19:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
== Comments by 2601:647:5800:1A1F:50AB:FFB9:DD80:EFC5 ==
| |||