Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Skomorokh: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 238:
#::I am striking my !vote because I find the wording of comments like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Skomorokh&diff=301595641&oldid=301595292 the second part of this one] <small>("What is problematic about describing the Holocaust as something that is believed in? Is the minority opinion on the issue not termed 'Holocast denial'?")</small> troubling, and I have not looked into the editing history of Skomorokh deeply enough to know if this is just a matter of casual phrasing for rhetorical impact, or if it represents a more fundamental difference in our understanding what is NPOV and encyclopedic. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 00:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Finally somebody stood up to the obnoxious copy and paste questions. [[User:Bjweeks|BJ]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Bjweeks|Talk]]</sup></small> 04:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Obvious support''' for a super editor. I see below that some people have concerns about Skomorokh's views, opinions, and whatnot, but then again, who doesn't disagree with people now and then? I don't care about what Sk. believes about Ayn Rand or what her(?) WikiPhilosophy is.... I care that Skomorokh has an impressive understanding of WP policy and is a huge asset to the encyclopedia all over the place. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<
#: That comment really says it all, doesn't it. [[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] ([[User talk:Peter Damian|talk]]) 21:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - being [[WP:HONESTY|honest]] is the most important asset of an editor, and more so an admin. This guy reeks honesty. --[[User:Cerejota|Cerejota]] ([[User talk:Cerejota|talk]]) 04:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 278:
#::::::Having witnessed the fractious efforts of editors trying to agree as to what the ideal version of the lead is, I came to the conclusion that it is better to get the work done first. [[user talk:Skomorokh|<span style="background: #222; color: #fff;"><font face="Goudy Old Style"> Skomorokh </font></span>]] 08:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
# '''Oppose'''. I prefer not to award powers and privileges to people who don't assign any importance to other editors' rights. [[User:Groomtech|Groomtech]] ([[User talk:Groomtech|talk]]) 17:13, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
#:What, because Sk didn't respond to your stock question, suddenly that means s/he doesn't care about editors' rights? <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<
#::Apparently not: at least, not enough to want to make any position known. [[User:Groomtech|Groomtech]] ([[User talk:Groomtech|talk]]) 10:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
#:::I'm sorry Groomtech, but as other candidates have pointed out before, that question is far too vague to be able to give a useful answer to. My stance on editor's rights should be very clear from my contributions, and while no-one expects you to trawl through every edit a candidate makes, it is expected that !voters familiarise themselves with the candidate through researching, especially in areas in which one has a particular interest. Regards, [[user talk:Skomorokh|<span style="background: #222; color: #fff;"><font face="Goudy Old Style"> Skomorokh </font></span>]] 13:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||