Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooperative-based graph clustering: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 17:
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 07:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 07:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' as this looks like a journal report instead of a solid encyclopedia article and there's also been noticeably ample time and space to improve it and that hasn't happened. [[User:SwisterTwister|<
*'''Delete''' per David Eppstein, above. Although the "article formatting" is not a reason to delete per se, it is a good indication that a primary source was copied, and I do not see any secondary sources out there. [[User:Tigraan|Tigraan]] ([[User talk:Tigraan|talk]]) 12:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' For this to be noteworthy, this topic should have decent coverage in independent secondary sources. I'm not seeing anything that demonstrates that strongly. [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ([[User talk:Kingofaces43|talk]]) 03:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
| |||