Content deleted Content added
Fixed some inaccurate or outdated informations |
|||
Line 999:
|
|
|Originally described as basal snake, but later study shows that may be snake-like [[Dolichosauridae|dolichosaur]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Caldwell |first=Michael W. |last2=Simões |first2=Tiago R. |last3=Palci |first3=Alessandro |last4=Garberoglio |first4=Fernando F. |last5=Reisz |first5=Robert R. |last6=Lee |first6=Michael S. Y. |last7=Nydam |first7=Randall L. |date=2021-07-03 |title=Tetrapodophis amplectus is not a snake: re-assessment of the osteology, phylogeny and functional morphology of an Early Cretaceous dolichosaurid lizard |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2021.1983044 |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |volume=19 |issue=13 |pages=893–952 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2021.1983044 |issn=1477-2019}}</ref>
|
|-
|