Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Series/Tutorial/Archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 96:
: and so on ...
If anyone is interested, I'd like to review pre-publication. It's alarming that at the level of our "best" quality (FA) articles, we have frequent nominators who have no idea that their articles are based on non-reliable sources, and they're getting through GAC and PR with no scrutiny. I wish I had a tutorial link to post on those noms, rather than having to explain repeatedly. Not sure why they don't understand [[WP:V]] :-)) [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<
: Feel free to add that to the main project page in one of the tables. I think you raise an excellent issue, but I suspect that it might have to do with a more fundamental problem, not just on Wikipedia. I suspect that these people who don't know what a good reference is on Wikipedia don't know what a good reference would be for their term paper either... [[User:Enochlau|enochlau]] ([[User talk:Enochlau|talk]]) 13:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
| |||