Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Noloop: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:17, 23 August 2009

Latest revision as of 06:23, 27 March 2022

Line 1:

=== Statement by Ched ===

I added some links to other discussions that I thought would be relevant in the "Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried" section. I don't know why the community has not been more proactive in resolving these issues myself, but I suspect that there is a reluctance by some to attempt to enforce various policies and guidelines due to the perception that it would be met with some condemnation from some established editors who view the [[WP:CIV]] policy as unenforceable. Personally I see a bit of [[WP:KETTLE|pot/kettle]] in play with much of this, and I view neither parties as squeaky clean in the matter. Thank you for your time. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<fontspan style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</fontspan>]]</span></small> 05:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

:;Response to User:Slatersteven addendum:

::I should clarify that my comment "''I view neither parties as squeaky clean''" was primary directed toward the edits of Noloop and WebHamster. I have never noticed any improprieties in any of Slatersteven's edits. Also, while the abrupt change in views in Abce2's comments is not something I fully understand, I am not aware of anything worthy of sanctions. I do note that there does seem to be a concerted effort by Abce2 to bring User:Noloop's edits to light, apparently in search of some community declaration. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<fontspan style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</fontspan>]]</span></small> 14:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)