Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 105: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:18, 13 January 2022

Revision as of 07:16, 27 March 2022

Line 657:

=== Statement by Nableezy ===

The rule itself is not a bad idea, it's just worded terribly. Just change it to the following and all the confusion about what ''original editor'' means goes away:<blockquote>Editors may not re-revert a revert of their edit for at least 24 hours from the initial revert of their edit.</blockquote>You go back to the original 1RR you go back to the situation where somebody is able to force their edit in based off edit->revert->re-revert (that being the first revert by the initial editor). <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)</small>

:Yes I see that is a bit ''how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck would chuck wood''-ish, but I think we all would understand it. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:47, 7 November 2018 (UTC)</small>

=== Statement by EdJohnston ===