Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fp code: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
[[fp code]]: close debate; result was delete.
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
Line 20:
:'''Comment''': I purposely didn't use jargons and to me, although it is not important, it is consistent and complete. I could elaborate further, especially its application in computation but I thought this is for general audience. MCB, it is incomprehensible to you, probably because I didn't explain it using conventional logic, which was my intention. Why is it a nonsense if it works? It can work with a very simple program and it will automatically reduce to an outcome. Sorry if I made a mistake in writing this article. It seems you guys prefer me being a machine than being a human. I have a tendancy to think like a machine but I thought that was not appropriate. Do what you like with articles, but I could fill twenty or more full articles with the foundation of what I have wrote in Fp code, which I chose not to. My understanding was that this is for general audience and I had an interesting idea so I wanted to share it. I could do much more without being technical, such as to write a decoder program like in Geek Code. That may well happen if I do decide to develop this concept further. Please do understand that it was not my intention to post a garbage article. Bye. [[User:Pyenos|Pyenos]] 23:53, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. No original research, also, [[User:Pyenos]] is basically describing [[Automata Theory]] and [[Compiler theory]] [[User:Project2501a|Project2501a]] 00:34, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</fontspan> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>