Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 48:
====Monotone increasing GQs====
A ''generalized quantifier'' GQ is said to be [[monotone increasing]] (also called [[upward entailing]]) if, for every pair of sets ''X'' and ''Y'', the following holds:
The GQ ''every boy'' is monotone increasing. For example, the set of things that ''run fast'' is a subset of the set of things that ''run''. Therefore, the first sentence below [[Entailment|entail]]s the second:
#Every boy runs fast.
Line 55:
====Monotone decreasing GQs====
A GQ is said to be [[monotone decreasing]] (also called [[downward entailing]]) if, for every pair of sets ''X'' and ''Y'', the following holds:
An example of a monotone decreasing GQ is ''no boy''. For this GQ we have that the first sentence below entails the second.
#No boy runs.
#No boy runs fast.
The lambda term for the [[determiner (linguistics)|determiner]] ''no'' is the following. It says that the two sets have an empty [[Intersection (set theory)|intersection]].
Monotone decreasing GQs are among the expressions that can license a [[negative polarity item]], such as ''any''. Monotone increasing GQs do not license negative polarity items.
#Good: No boy has '''any''' money.
Line 72:
The lambda term for the (complex) [[determiner (linguistics)|determiner]] ''exactly three'' is the following. It says that the [[cardinality]] of the [[Intersection (set theory)|intersection]] between the two sets equals 3.
===Conservativity===
{{Further|Conservativity}}
A determiner D is said to be ''conservative'' if the following equivalence holds:
For example, the following two sentences are equivalent.
#Every boy sleeps.
|