Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by Gajjardeep50 (talk) to last revision by 85.76.82.209 |
Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 114:
== Criticism section ==
<b>C++ Singleton Design Pattern.</b> The C++ singleton design, is not what a c++ class structure is designed for, yet, is natural in C. Forcing this design pattern into a class, is a bit pompous, and indicates too much of a zeal to always use C++, even where it is not the best solution in the C and C++ code or perhaps is a prime example of bike shedding. it's is a trivial design pattern to understand, therefore, I must use it in C++, and make it more complex then it needs to be.
[[Special:Contributions/162.72.107.205|162.72.107.205]] ([[User talk:162.72.107.205|talk]]) 17:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
<p>
An anon removed the cricicism section [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Design_pattern_(computer_science)&curid=164952&diff=394670144&oldid=394432432] iwith the comment
:''(Moved valid information out of a criticisms section into the rest of the article. In the process, removed information that was the result of the writer's personal ignorance.)''
The remove material is
<blockquote>
==Criticism==
{{Criticism section|date=August 2009}}
| |||