Revision as of 08:14, 15 April 2022 edit Dandorid (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,434 edits m →Workarounds and solutions: Ref rfc1058 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:18, 15 April 2022 edit undo Dandorid (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,434 edits →References: RFC1723 is obsoleted by RFC2453 Next edit →
Line 583: ==References== {{Reflist}} * {{Ref RFC\|2453\|ref=no}} * [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1058.txt "RFC1058 - Routing Information Protocol", C. Hedrick, Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1988] * [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1723.txt "RFC1723 - RIP Version 2 Carrying Additional Information", G. Malkin, Internet Engineering Task Force, November, 1994] * [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2453.txt "RFC2453 - RIP Version 2", G. Malkin, Internet Engineering Task Force, November, 1998] * "A Path-Finding Algorithm for Loop-Free Routing'', J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves and S. Murthy, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, February 1997 * "Detection of Invalid Routing Announcements in the RIP Protocol", D. Pei, D. Massey, and L. Zhang, IEEE Global Communications Conference (Globecom), December, 2003

Distance-vector routing protocol: Difference between revisions