Talk:Universal Windows Platform apps: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:53, 20 February 2019

Revision as of 10:02, 19 April 2022

Line 18:

:Best regards,

:[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 07:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

:: Windows 10 search box refers to these as "Trusted Windows Store app". Metro-style was simply a [[codename]] used in development. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;">[[User:ViperSnake151|<fontspan style="color:#8f5902;">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</fontspan>]] [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<fontspan style="color:#fff; background:#fcaf3e;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</fontspan>]] </span> 20:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

::: {{replyto|ViperSnake151}} Do you have a purpose from repeating Dogmaticeclectic's sentence from three years ago?

::: Best regards,

::: [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 08:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

:::: Microsoft is also officially using the term "Universal Windows Platform" (UWP) <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;">[[User:ViperSnake151|<fontspan style="color:#8f5902;">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</fontspan>]] [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<fontspan style="color:#fff; background:#fcaf3e;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</fontspan>]] </span> 01:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:::::{{Replyto|ViperSnake151}} Yes, and the article mentions both "Universal Windows Platform" and "UWP". What is your point?

:::::Best regards,

Line 43:

:Best regards,

:[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 21:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

::I'm sorry, but this article reads like an opinionated PR piece that tries to shame other types of software. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;">[[User:ViperSnake151|<fontspan style="color:#8f5902;">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</fontspan>]] [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<fontspan style="color:#fff; background:#fcaf3e;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</fontspan>]] </span> 01:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:::I personally don't see how it seems opinionated and the content seems to be well sourced and verified, also any usage of Microsoft's terms is quoted to make sure that the reader understands that the editors don't take these weasel words too serious. --[[User:Hoang the Hoangest|Hoang the Hoangest]] ([[User talk:Hoang the Hoangest|talk]]) 09:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:::{{Replyto|ViperSnake151}} I asked for your feedback two years ago. Why didn't you say that back then? Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 16:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:::: So basically, because I apparently did not respond two years ago, all of my comments are invalid? <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;">[[User:ViperSnake151|<fontspan style="color:#8f5902;">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</fontspan>]] [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<fontspan style="color:#fff; background:#fcaf3e;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</fontspan>]] </span> 17:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

::::: Um... First, you should actually comment. Which words? Where? and What objection?

::::: Only after you make the comment I can tell whether it is valid or not. (Although, you have never made invalid comments.) Of course, if it is about something other than Naypta's issue, please kindly open another thread.