Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allvue Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Allvue Systems: Reply |
→Allvue Systems: Reply |
||
Line 9:
*'''Delete''' I was in the middle of bringing this here, but {{u|Timtrent}} beat me to it! Pure ADMASQ, sources are just press release regurgitations and the like, and a search finds only more of the same. Fails [[WP:GNG]] / [[WP:ORGCRIT]]. --[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 11:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
*:@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] If only the editors involved in creating material like this listened during the AFC review process AfD would not be troubled so often with inappropriate unilateral moves. That one may do a thing does not mean one should. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 12:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
:Sorry, didn't realise the process is it's kept in drafts as edits are done, I've moved it back now, would you be able to link me to the page that explains how you get reviews done in the draftspace? [[User:Squaumau|Squaumau]] ([[User talk:Squaumau|talk]]) 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
| |||