Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allvue Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Allvue Systems: reply |
weak delete, with explanation |
||
Line 13:
::I believe we should interpret that as a request by {{U|Squaumau}} to '''Draftify''' the article.
::To further your knowledge, Squaumau, I suggest you go to [[WP:TEAHOUSE]], where you may ask all the questions you wish, or as an ''alternative'' to [[WP:AFCHD]]. Pick one or the other, but not both, please. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 22:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
*'''Weak Delete''' pending a review of the sources (which I might or might not do). On its face, there are [[WP:N|notability]] and [[WP:TONE|tone]] concerns. The article is written from the corporation's viewpoint, and does not report on what third parties have said, but that is the basis of [[WP:NCORP|corporate notability]]. The article is blatantly [[WP:PROMO|promotional]], and its author has been asked about [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]], and has not yet had time to answer. The article was moved into draft space by a reviewer, but moved back to article space by the author, which is permitted, but does not indicate collaboration. The author then attempted to move the article back to draft space after it was nominated for deletion. That is [[WP:GAME|gaming the system]], but that is a conduct issue, and AFD is a content forum. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 01:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
| |||