Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StreamSQL: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:34, 30 March 2022

Revision as of 00:29, 1 May 2022

Line 7:

===[[StreamSQL]]===

Found this on prod and I think it deserves an afd. This is surely ad copy that needs to be rewritten NPOV. Mentions in popular media: [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6841084/ MSNBC/Forbes.com] [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2005/07/14/DI2005071401271.html Washington Post (though trivial)] [http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1764976,00.asp?rsDis=Database_Legend:_How_Real_Time_Data_Analysis_Will_Transform_Society-Page002-145806 eWeek] [http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2005/012405edit.html] [http://www.fiteclub.org/meetings/20060315-Stonebraker.html] [http://www.cioupdate.com/trends/article.php/3583236] [http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:YbTkZyMDg-AJ:www.cs.brown.edu/~ugur/8rulesSigRec.pdf+streamsql+-streambase.com&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6&client=firefox-a] [http://www.databasejournal.com/news/article.php/3482751 database journal] [http://www.stephenibaraki.com/cips/v35/mstoneb.html] and more on google. '''No vote''' yet. [[User:Kotepho|kotepho]] 20:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

* <s>'''Delete''' </s>Full disclosure - I was the one who prodded it. Now much cleaned up but I find the notability a bit suspect. [[User:Dlyons493|<FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#00FF00;">Dl</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#44FF00;">yo</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#99DD11;">ns</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#DDDD11;">493</FONTspan>]] [[User_talk:Dlyons493|<FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#DDDD11;">Ta</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#00FF00;">lk</FONTspan>]] 21:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''': ''this article'' is certainly ad copy. --[[User:Deville|Deville]] ([[User talk:Deville|Talk]]) 04:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

* '''Revised, NPOV, and facts added''' Updated article based on above feedback.([[User:DMParent|DMParent]] 22:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC))

Line 15:

* '''Don't delete''' I think this article will sort itself out as standardization efforts progress. I killed off the marketing and added more techincal detail. [[User:Tibbetts2c|Tibbetts2c]] 21:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

**Reverting to '''Strong Delete'''. Adding ''The leading company in StreamSQL implementation and standardization is StreamBase Systems.'' (complete with link) doesn't equate to '''killed off the marketing''' in my mind. Note that [[User:Tibbetts2c|Tibbetts2c]]'s only edits have been to this article (created by [[User:Sbmarketing]]) [[User:Dlyons493|<FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#00FF00;">Dl</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#44FF00;">yo</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#99DD11;">ns</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#DDDD11;">493</FONTspan>]] [[User_talk:Dlyons493|<FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#DDDD11;">Ta</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#00FF00;">lk</FONTspan>]] [[User:Dlyons493|Dlyons493]] 21:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' I think this is decent enough for me to vote keep. [[User:Kotepho|kotepho]] 21:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Killed the implementation section entirely. That addresses the above point. There are multiple commercial entities using StreamSQL-like approaches to solving this problem now, so I vote to keep it.