Revision as of 16:48, 9 May 2022 edit Serols (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 482,806 edits m Reverted edits by 67.166.132.169 (talk): unexplained content removal (HG) (3.4.10) Tag: Rollback ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:50, 9 May 2022 edit undo 67.166.132.169 (talk) →Reviews: I felt that this was an unhelpful bit of information, as well as negative. Tag: references removed Next edit →
Line 111: On Cinema Blend, it was praised for "wacky wordplay, catchy tunes, and good-natured ribbing".<ref name="CB">{{cite web\|url=https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Holy-Musical-Batman-Caped-Crusader-Gets-Song-Dance-Spectacular-30572.html\|title=Holy Musical Batman! The Caped Crusader Gets A Song And Dance Spectacular\|date=23 April 2012}}</ref> On Hypable, Goodfinder praised the performances of Jeff Blim, Joe Walker, Brian Holden and Lauren Lopez, but said "''Holy Musical B@man'' just didn't have that [[StarKid]] spark." and that "the music stood out too much on its own instead of being a part of the whole show, it was a bit nonsensical and seems aimless at times."<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://www.hypable.com/fan-review-holy-musical-bman-lacks-that-starkid-spark/\|title=Fan Review: 'Holy Musical B@man' has its strengths and weaknesses\|date=21 April 2012}}</ref> At [[ComicsAlliance]], Chris Sims praised the show, calling it "surprisingly catchy" and that "the love that the creators have for the character is evident."<ref name="CA"/> ==See also== * [[List of musicals]]

Holy Musical B@man!: Difference between revisions