Content deleted Content added
Disjointness of types |
|||
Line 33:
I am not the one who originally deleted the link to [[Toki Pona]], but after checking it, there is no Scheme code on that page contrary to what the section title claims. In fact it does not have anything to do with Scheme. Therefore I have removed the link. Is there any good reason to link to that article that I have missed?
[[User:Zsam|Sam]] 04:47, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
== Disjointness of types ==
A point: while the current scheme standards assert that the types are disjoint, and in particular that #f and '() are distinct, this has only been the case since the IEEE standard and R4RS. R3RS permitted these two to be the same, and MIT scheme had this equality. This comment is provoked by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Scheme_programming_language&diff=0&oldid=6597449 this edit]. ---- [[User:Chalst|Charles Stewart]] 14:54, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
| |||