Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 607:
:* As an aside, you will note, Locke, that the admin, Xeno, who first moved that essay into WP-space has stepped in to put a stop to your vandalism. Your assertion that the views of the essay ''“largely represents the view of one editor”'' is a lie. I see your new [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Why_dates_should_not_be_linked&oldid=279182021 vandalism] to Wikipedia. Your disruption has to stop. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">'''[[User:Greg L|Greg L]]''' ([[User_talk:Greg_L|talk]])</span> 17:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
::*Just to clarify, I did not move it into WP-space, I simply moved it from a subpage of WP:MOS onto its own page in WP space (i.e., it was already in WP space, I just relocated it). This was/is not an endorsement of its habitation (to which I have no prejudice), and I see an MFD has been initiated on the page, which is probably an appropriate way to decide where it should live. –<
:::Thank you for the clarification. I hope the MFD is able to proceed regardless of Greg L raving about "disruption" and "vandalism" both there and here. — [[User:Hex|<span style="color:#000">Hex</span>]] [[User_talk:Hex|<span title="Hex's talk page"><span style="color:#000">(❝</span>'''<span style="color:#900">?!</span>'''<span style="color:#000">❞)</span></span>]] 18:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
:::* Well, pardon me all over the place for seeing a “<s>speedy</s> miscellany for deletion tag” (“'''This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.'''”) and jumping to the *rash* conclusion that Locke was asking that it be deleted. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">'''[[User:Greg L|Greg L]]''' ([[User_talk:Greg_L|talk]])</span> 18:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
| |||