Voice computing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: website. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BrownHairedGirl | Linked from User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles_with_bare_links | #UCB_webform_linked 829/2189
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: title. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BrownHairedGirl | #UCB_webform 1260/1387
Line 99:
In the United States, the states have varying [[telephone call recording laws]]. In some states, it is legal to record a conversation with the consent of only one party, in others the consent of all parties is required.
 
Moreover, [[COPPA]] is a significant law to protect minors using the Internet. With an increasing number of minors interacting with voice computing devices (e.g. the Amazon Alexa), on October 23, 2017 the [[Federal Trade Commission]] relaxed the COPAA rule so that children can issue voice searches and commands.<ref>Techcrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2017/10/24/ftc-relaxes-coppa-rule-so-kids-can-issue-voice-searches-and-commands/</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/08/2017-26509/enforcement-policy-statement-regarding-the-applicability-of-the-coppa-rule-to-the-collection-and-use | title=Federal Register :: Request Access }}</ref>
 
Lastly, [[GDPR]] is a new European law that governs the [[right to be forgotten]] and many other clauses for EU citizens. GDPR also is clear that companies need to outline clear measures to obtain consent if audio recordings are made and define the purpose and scope as to how these recordings will be used, e.g., for training purposes. The bar for valid consent has been raised under the GDPR. Consents must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous; tacit consent is no longer sufficient.<ref>IAPP. https://iapp.org/news/a/how-do-the-rules-on-audio-recording-change-under-the-gdpr/</ref>