Revision as of 11:31, 28 June 2003 edit Kevin Baas (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,428 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:55, 28 June 2003 edit undo Hawthorn (talk \| contribs) 465 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 20: I think that the new version is much worse. It is not pedagogoical and not helpfull at all for someone who just wants to learn what an inverse function is. Please revert. [[User:Kevin_baas]] :Wouldn't someone who just wants to know what an inverse function is be better off looking at page [[inverse function]]? (suitably upgraded if neccessary) : Even accepting your point of view, I wouldn't recommend a simple revert. The old page had :* Examples of inverse functions, but no examples talking about their derivatives :two proofs, the first of which was in my opinion flawed. :some fallacies about derivatives and inverse functions. :Forthese reasons I would prefer to discuss which aspects of the old page you want preserved and talk about reintroducing just those elements. :[[user:hawthorn\|hawthorn]]

Talk:Inverse function rule: Difference between revisions