Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) m Fix font tag lint errors |
||
Line 205:
#'''Support''' haven't managed to take as thorough a review of this editor as I would normally, but a quick flick through suggests they are a net positive to the project, and a good candidate for adminship. Go for it -- [[User:Samtar|'''sam'''''tar'']] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Samtar|talk]] or [[Special:Contributions/Samtar|stalk]]</small></sup> 16:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
#For the sake of conciseness, I'll say "per all of the above." [[User:Epicgenius|Kylo, Rey, & Finn Consortium, now featuring BB-8]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 16:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as he has done some excellent work for Wikipedia as a non-admin and I believe these will be further accelerated through adminship. The first Oppose is a complete violation of AGF which needs looking into. --[[User:Patient Zero|<
#'''Support''' They seem polite and friendly and you really can never have too many level-headed, fast-learning admins willing to clear unglamourous backlogs. Students make a full time occupation of learning things quickly and very well by reading them. I have also found Wikipedia to be quite easy to learn, though I tend to be cautious anyway. After seeing the mess and heartbreak that a new user acting with good faith and no competence can cause, I wish we could stop automatically suspecting new competent account. We want new users to read a few policies before editing, if possible. [[user:Happysquirrel|Happy Squirrel]] ([[user talk:Happysquirrel|talk]]) 17:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' from the first time I interacted with Rob after a TfD closure I wondered how he wasn't already an admin. I have no reservations. [[User:Wugapodes|Wugapodes]] [[User talk:Wugapodes|[t<sup>h</sup>ɔk]]] [[Special:Contributions/Wugapodes|[kantʃɻɪbz]]] 18:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
| |||