Talk:Finite-difference time-___domain method: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:27, 4 March 2022

Revision as of 19:28, 7 June 2022

Line 98:

'''Split''' I would start by splitting the list off to [[List of FDTD software]]. That seems to have worked well for [[List of numerical analysis software]] and [[List of PTP implementations]], for instance. If that's not a fully acceptable solution you can then nominate the new article for deletion and debate it there. -—[[user talk:Kvng|Kvng]] 15:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

* '''Split''' to [[List of finite-difference time-___domain software]] as proposed above by Kvng, keeping only ones with sourcing. (I'm uninvolved, called by RFC bot) --[[User:Cyclopia|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">Cycl</fontspan><big>o</big><fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">pia</fontspan>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red">^talk</font>]] 10:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

::For the record, RFC bot brought me here too. -—[[user talk:Kvng|Kvng]] 13:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Line 105:

*'''Comment'''. As EL, all the entries are already referenced to themselves, but currently, there are no ''independent'' sources discussing or comparing them. As it stands, I would be inclined to AfD such a list article were it to be created. '''[[User:Spinningspark|<span style="background:#fafad2; color:#C08000;">Spinning</span>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<span style="color:#4840a0;">Spark</span>]]''' 21:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

::We're not speaking of cut-and-paste the list as it is; it should be referenced to third party sources etc. --[[User:Cyclopia|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">Cycl</fontspan><big>o</big><fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">pia</fontspan>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red">^talk</font>]] 11:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

:::Do you have a source(s) that a list could be be based on? '''[[User:Spinningspark|<span style="background:#fafad2; color:#C08000;">Spinning</span>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<span style="color:#4840a0;">Spark</span>]]''' 11:49, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

:There are probably hundreds of lists on WP that are not collectively cited (there are three referred to in this discussion above). If you don't believe such lists should exist on WP, that's a larger issue that needs to be taken up elsewhere. -—[[user talk:Kvng|Kvng]] 17:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Line 112:

::: Oh, and I <3 RFC-bot, which brought me also. <span style="padding:2px;background-color:white;color:#666;">&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Sj|SJ]][[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">&nbsp;+</font>]]</span>

::Is it not very simple to understand in accordance to [[Wikipedia:External links]] as it states "Some external links are welcome (see [[#What can normally be linked|What can normally be linked]], below), but it is [[WP:NOT#LINK|not]] Wikipedia's purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic." I have removed many long lists of external links from hundreds of articles. That means those must be reverted as what here is being discussed. I think '''[[User:Spinningspark|<fontspan style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</fontspan>]]''' is in right direction.Links should be removed except few.Thanks. [[User:Justice007|Justice007]] ([[User talk:Justice007|talk]]) 17:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

:::I don't think anyone is supporting the external links section as it currently exists. The question is whether to just delete most of it or salvage it some way. -—[[user talk:Kvng|Kvng]] 20:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)