Control reversal: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:52, 13 January 2007

Revision as of 04:54, 19 February 2007

Line 1:

'''Control reversal''' is an adverse effect on the controllability of [[aircraft]]. To the pilot it appears that the [[flight controls]] have reversed themselves; in order to roll to the left, for instance, they have to push the control stick to the right, opposite of the normal direction.

There are several causes for this problem: pilot error, effects of [[high -speed flight]], incorrectly connected controls, and various coupling forces on the aircraft.

[[Pilot error]] is the most common cause of control reversal. In [[unusual attitudesattitude]]s it is not uncommon for the pilot to become disoriented and start feeding in incorrect control movements in order to regain level flight. This is particularly common when using helmet mounted display systems, which introduce graphics that remain steady in the pilot's view, notably when using a particular form of attitude display known as an ''inside-out'' display.{{fact}}

Incorrectly connected controls isare another common cause of this problem. It is a recurring problem after maintenance on aircraft, notably homebuilt designs that are being flown for the first time after some minor work. However it is not entirely uncommon on commercial aircraft, and has been the cause of several accidents including the death of Avro designer [[Roy Chadwick]].{{fact}}

Another version of the problem occurs when the amount of airflow over the [[wing]] becomes great enough that the force generated by the [[aileron]]s is enough to twist the wing itself, due to insufficient [[torsion]]al stiffness of the wing structure. For instance when the aileron is deflected upwards in order to make that wing move down, the wing twists in the opposite direction. The net result is that the airflow is directed down instead of up and the wing moves upward, opposite of what was expected. This form of control reversal is often lumped in with a number of "high speed" effects as [[compressibility]].

The [[Boeing B-47]] was speed limited at low altitudes because the large, flexible wings would cancel out the effect of the control surfaces under some circumstances.{{fact}}

Due to the unusually high speeds forthat the time[[Supermarine that itSpitfire]] could be dived at, this problem of aileron reversal became apparent on the [[Supermarine Spitfire]] when it was wished to increase the lateral manouverabilty (rate of roll) by increasing the aileron area. The aircraft had a wing designed originally for an aileron reversal speedairspeed of 580 [[Miles per hour|mph]], and any attempt to increase the aileron area would have resulted in the wing twisting when the larger ailerons were applied at high speed, the aircraft then rolling in the opposite direction to that intended by the pilot. The problem of increasing the rate of roll was temporarily alleviated with the introduction of "clipped" wing tips (to reduce the aerodynamic load on the tip area, allowing larger ailerons to be used) until a new, stiffer wing could be incorporated. This new wing was introduced in the Mark XXI and had a theoretical aileron reversal speed of 825 mph.

Finally the [[Wright Brothers]] suffered yet another form of control reversal, one normally referred to as [[adverse yaw]]. In their pre-[[Wright1902 Flyer|Flyerglider]] gliders they continued to encounter a problem where the glider would startroll to turnin one direction, thenbut suddenlyyaw in the reverse direction, andthe spin into the ground. They eventually cured the problem by adding a movingmovable rudder system, now found on all aircraft.

The root cause of the problem was dynamic. Warping the wing did what was expected in terms of lift, thereby rolling the plane, but also had an unexpectedly large effect on drag. The result was that the upward-moving wing was dragged backwards, yawing the glider. If this yaw was violent enough, the additional speed on the lower wing as it was driven forward would make it generate more lift, and reverse the direction of the roll.

This issue also affected the [[Gossamer Condor]], the [[Kremer_prizes|Kremer Prize]]-winning human-powered airplane. When a wing-warping mechanism was tried as a solution to a long-running turning problem, the effect was to turn the airplane in the opposite direction to that expected by conventional airplane knowledge. When the Condor was rigged "conventionally", the inside wing slowed down so much that it settled to the ground. By employing "backwards" wired wing-warping, the inside wingtip [[angle of attack]] was increased so that the added drag slowed that wing while the added lift allowed the airfoil to stay aloft at a slower speed. The tilted canard could then complete the turn.{{fact}}

==External links==