Revision as of 17:38, 4 February 2022 edit Maxeto0910 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 117,106 edits Added short description. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:15, 11 June 2022 edit undo Citation bot (talk \| contribs) Bots 5,869,007 edits Alter: template type. Add: magazine. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. \| Use this bot. Report bugs. \| Suggested by BrownHairedGirl \| #UCB_webform 2852/3604 Next edit →
Line 331: \|publisher=Science Daily }}</ref> Intelligent design proponent [[Michael Behe]] concedes "You can't prove intelligent design by experiment".<ref name="Time-15-Aug-2005"> {{cite ~~news~~magazine \|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1090909,00.html \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050809001041/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1090909,00.html Line 341: \|first=Claudia \|date=August 7, 2005 \|~~work~~magazine=Time }}</ref> Line 569: \|pmc=1451210 }} *{{cite ~~web~~magazine \|quote=Biologists aren't alarmed by intelligent design's arrival in Dover and elsewhere because they have all sworn allegiance to atheistic materialism; they're alarmed because intelligent design is junk science. \|first=H. Allen \|last=Orr \|~~work~~magazine=The New Yorker \|date=May 2005 \|url=http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/05/30/050530fa_fact Line 851: \|pages=2651–2664 \|issn=0961-8368 ~~\|url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/121602290/HTMLSTART\|archive-url=https://archive.today/20121210120220/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/121602290/HTMLSTART~~ ~~\|url-status=dead~~ ~~\|archive-date=2012-12-10~~ \|doi=10.1110/ps.04802904 \|pmid=15340163

Intelligent design and science: Difference between revisions