Hartogs's extension theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Formal statement: I think proof is just short/elementary enough to be good to include
Line 20:
:Let {{mvar|f}} be a [[holomorphic function]] on a [[Set (mathematics)|set]] {{math|''G''&nbsp;\&nbsp;''K''}}, where {{mvar|G}} is an open subset of {{math|'''C'''<sup>''n''</sup>}} ({{math|''n'' ≥ 2}}) and {{mvar|K}} is a compact subset of {{mvar|G}}. If the [[Complement (set theory)|complement]] {{math|''G''&nbsp;\&nbsp;''K''}} is connected, then {{mvar|f}} can be extended to a unique holomorphic function {{mvar|F}} on {{mvar|G}}.{{sfnm|1a1=Hörmander|1y=1990|1loc=Theorem 2.3.2}}
 
TheEhrenpreis' proof is based on the existence of smooth [[bump function]]s, unique continuation of holomorphic functions, and the [[Poincaré lemma]] &mdash; the last in the form that for any smooth and compactly supported differential (0,1)-form {{mvar|&omega;}} on {{math|'''C'''<sup>''n''</sup>}} with {{math|{{overline|∂}}''&omega;'' {{=}} 0}}, there exists a smooth and compactly supported function {{mvar|&eta;}} on {{math|'''C'''<sup>''n''</sup>}} with {{math|{{overline|∂}}''&eta;'' {{=}} ''&omega;''}}. The crucial assumption {{math|''n'' ≥ 2}} is required for the validity of this Poincaré lemma; if {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}} then it is generally impossible for {{mvar|&eta;}} to be compactly supported.{{sfnm|1a1=Hörmander|1y=1990|1p=30}}
 
The ansatz for {{mvar|F}} is {{math|''&phi; f'' − ''v''}} for smooth functions {{mvar|&phi;}} and {{mvar|v}} on {{mvar|G}}; such an expression is meaningful provided that {{mvar|&phi;}} is identically equal to zero where {{mvar|f}} is undefined (namely on {{mvar|K}}). Furthermore, given any holomorphic function on {{mvar|G}} which is equal to {{mvar|f}} on ''some'' open set, unique continuation (based on connectedness of {{math|''G''&nbsp;\&nbsp;''K''}}) shows that it is equal to {{mvar|f}} on ''all'' of {{math|''G''&nbsp;\&nbsp;''K''}}.