Computing Machinery and Intelligence: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Line 35:
{{See also|Philosophy of artificial intelligence}}
 
Having clarified the question, Turing turned to answering it: he considered the following nine common objections, which include all the major arguments against artificial intelligence raised in the years since his paper was first published.<ref>{{Harvnb|Turing|1950}} see {{Harvnb|Russell|Norvig|2003|p=948}} where comment "Turing examined a wide variety of possible objections to the possibility of intelligent machines, including virtually all of those that have been raised in the half century since his paper appeared."</ref>
 
#''[[Religious]] Objection'': This states that thinking is a function of man's [[Immortality|immortal]] [[soul]]; therefore, a machine cannot think. "In attempting to construct such machines," wrote Turing, "we should not be irreverently usurping His power of creating souls, any more than we are in the procreation of children: rather we are, in either case, instruments of His will providing mansions for the souls that He creates."