Revision as of 06:42, 27 June 2022 edit David Eppstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 235,633 edits Undid revision 1095212435 by Rublev (talk) Perhaps you didn't notice, but the sum is over positive AND NEGATIVE indices. The correction term is only needed when the sum is limited to positive indices. Tag: Undo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:34, 30 June 2022 edit undo Chrisahn (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 13,521 edits →Definition and examples: p(1289844341) isn't the largest ECPP prime anymore Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Next edit →
Line 22: \end{align}</math> {{As of\|~~2020~~2022\|~~February~~June}}, the largest known [[prime number]] among the values of {{math\|''p''(''n'')}} is {{math\|''p''(1289844341)}}, with 40,000 decimal digits;.{{r\|caldwell}}<ref>{{citation \|title=PrimePage Primes: p(1289844341) \|url=https://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=130336 \|website=primes.utm.edu \|access-date=30 June 2022}}</ref> Until March 2022, this iswas also the largest prime that has been proved using [[elliptic curve primality proving]].<ref>{{citation \|title=~~PrimePage~~The ~~Primes~~Top Twenty: ~~p(1289844341)~~Elliptic Curve Primality Proof \|url=https://primes.utm.edu/~~primes~~top20/page.php?id=~~130336~~27 \|website=primes.utm.edu \|access-date=630 ~~January~~June 2022}}</ref> == Generating function==

Partition function (number theory): Difference between revisions