Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1095804279 by D.Lazard (talk) Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary Please articulate why exactly you found the previous version "understandable" and I'd be happy to work with you improve it. |
|||
Line 101:
Throughout this section we will assume that <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> are [[topological vector space]]s.
<math>\mathcal{G}</math> will be a non-empty collection of subsets of <math>X</math> [[Directed set|directed]] by inclusion.
<math>L(X; Y)</math> will denote the vector space of all continuous linear maps from <math>X</math> into <math>Y.</math> If <math>L(X; Y)</math> is given the <math>\mathcal{G}</math>-topology inherited from <math>Y^X</math> then this space with this topology is denoted by <math>L_{\mathcal{G}}(X; Y)</math>.
The <math>\mathcal{G}</math>-topology on <math>L(X; Y)</math> is compatible with the vector space structure of <math>L(X; Y)</math> if and only if for all <math>G \in \mathcal{G}</math> and all <math>f \in L(X; Y)</math> the set <math>f(G)</math> is bounded in <math>Y,</math> which we will assume to be the case for the rest of the article.
Line 114 ⟶ 112:
'''Assumptions that guarantee a vector topology'''
The above assumption guarantees that the collection of sets <math>\mathcal{U}(G, N)</math> forms a [[filter base]].
Line 120 ⟶ 118:
Every TVS has a neighborhood basis at 0 consisting of balanced sets so this assumption isn't burdensome.
The following assumption is very commonly made because it will guarantee that each set <math>\mathcal{U}(G, N)</math> is absorbing in <math>L(X; Y).</math>
The next theorem gives ways in which <math>\mathcal{G}</math> can be modified without changing the resulting <math>\mathcal{G}</math>-topology on <math>Y.</math>
|