Content deleted Content added
→First half of the video: Reply Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
m Reverted edits by Oversized Lego spoon 64 (talk) to last version by MalnadachBot responding to very old posts |
||
Line 11:
Another issue is that the authors of the video are British, and the video is similar to BBC educational programming for children, not so similar to Sesame Street. That is, the existing article seems to have a USA perspective. [[User:Createangelos|Createangelos]] ([[User talk:Createangelos|talk]]) 00:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
== Request to semi-Protect ==
Line 33 ⟶ 31:
[[Special:Contributions/99.237.154.147|99.237.154.147]] ([[User talk:99.237.154.147|talk]]) 00:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Wikiisawesome|<span style="color:#600">/wia</span>]]🎄[[User talk:Wikiisawesome|<span style="color:#600"><small>/tlk</small></span>]] 03:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
== Theme of E5 ==
Line 43 ⟶ 39:
:: Why are we trying to give the episodes names that aren't official anyway? We should either use the numbers or official names supported by suitable sources. Giving them names that attempt to summarise the theme of episodes that are widely debated and unofficial would be like wikipedia pages entitled 'Hamlet: Loss' or 'Macbeth: Ambition'. <span style="color:#cb7b40;">'''Dubbin'''</span><sup>''[[User:Dubbin|u]] | [[User talk:Dubbin#top|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Dubbin|c]]''</sup> 15:57, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
::: I've taken the liberty of removing all episode subtitles. The only one we know for sure is episode 2 (TIME), but to include that and exclude others is anachronistic. One could argue from the title sequence that the subtitle for the first episode is "Great Creative", but I don't see that anywhere. Anyway, the episode descriptions already have the themes so I don't think it's necessary. [[User:FallingGravity|FallingGravity]] ([[User talk:FallingGravity|talk]]) 06:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
Line 63 ⟶ 57:
[http://www.itsnicethat.com/features/dont-hug-me-im-scared-interview-030516 Ref 19, an 'interview' with the 3 main characters], appears to confirm that 'Steak' is a lamb chop and that 'Duck Guy' ought to be called 'Duck'. However it's not clear whether this ref is suitably reliable. Thoughts? <span style="color:#cb7b40;">'''Dubbin'''</span><sup>''[[User:Dubbin|u]] | [[User talk:Dubbin#top|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Dubbin|c]]''</sup> 08:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
:Well, we're not sure whether the steak being a lamp chop is just made up by the author of the article or actually confirmed by the creators. [[User:Guysayshi|Guysayshi]] ([[User talk:Guysayshi|talk]]) 13:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
== Lets talk ==
Line 70 ⟶ 63:
:Please see [[WP:OR]] and [[WP:FAN]]. [[User:Adog104|'''<span style="color:#00A2FF">Adog</span><span style="color:#FFD600">104</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Adog104|<span style="color:#2EB347">'''''Talk to me'''''</span>]]</sup> 13:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
== Episode Guide ==
Line 77 ⟶ 68:
This is a blatantly excessive amount of in-universe details, for what are 5-minute long Youtube video clips. [[User:Power~enwiki|Power~enwiki]] ([[User talk:Power~enwiki|talk]]) 01:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
:Okay, so you feel it is 'blatantly excessive' but that doesn't mean we should just delete everything. If you feel the plot descriptions should be shortened, then shorten them. I'll try and get to this later if you don't feel like doing the work. There's no deadline here. [[User:Valeince|Valeince]] ([[User talk:Valeince|talk]]) 18:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
== What’s the Steak’s name? ==
Line 89 ⟶ 78:
There’s a seventh episode of Don’t Hug Me. I’m Scared, which isn’t really relevant to earlier episodes, but I still feel we should include in the Episodes category, but maybe not Characters. What do you think? [[User:Šüīçįdåł Śøñgbìrd|Šüīçįdåł Śøñgbìrd]] ([[User talk:Šüīçįdåł Śøñgbìrd|talk]]) 17:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
:{{re|Šüīçįdåł Śøñgbìrd}} It's named as DHMIS 7 as a joke, with none of the same characters. I propose that there's a new level 3 heading under 'Plot' after Episode 6 that talks about the kickstarter campaign shorts and this joke of an episode 7. -[[User:NottNott|<span style="color:#1c662a">Nott</span>]][[User talk:NottNott|<span style="color:#2ca243">Nott</span>]] 12:20, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
== Duck Guy or just Duck? ==
Line 95 ⟶ 83:
I've been watching these recently. When other people reference the main characters, they're referred to as Red Guy, Yellow Guy, and Duck. Is it Duck or Duck Guy? It seems to be pretty mixed on this, and I'm just checking to make sure.
[[User:Le Panini|Le Panini]] ([[User talk:Le Panini|talk]]) 02:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
== Plot summaries ==
Line 105 ⟶ 90:
::The lack of linearity in the plot is a characteristic of the surreal genre. Doesn't make sense to ask the summaries to have something the episodes don't have. (see for example David Lynch's [[Eraserhead]]; Jodorowsky's [[The Holy Mountain (1973 film)]]). - <code>[[User:Daveout|'''Daveout''']]</code><small>[[User talk:Daveout|<span style="color:#333b40">(talk)</span>]]</small> 15:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
:::I don't know, those two plot sections, even if non-linear to some degree, still seem to describe something much more cohesive, or do so in a better way. At the risk of repeating myself a little, the sections here, drawing on the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don%27t_Hug_Me_I%27m_Scared&oldid=1031676919#Episode_3:_Love Episode 3: Love] are mostly retellings, which, as I mentioned, makes sense in a way if you want to stretch out something that really is quite thin as far as plot or meaning goes. For example, that one puppet says "pesky bee", that the puppet repeats this later in the episode, or that another puppet says "father" before being crushed. A lot of these details listed, I would imagine, is simply fluff -- filler which may or may not have any real meaning or overall significance to the plot, so providing a concise plot summary is not really possible on such a per-episode basis because it can only be done through this scattershot, mention-everything kind of way, whereas the general plot section does so much more elegantly in a broader, more accessible way by looking at all the episodes as a whole. The way I see it, the episodes exist on a continuum -- Given how short they are and how they exist almost separately from each other apart from the episodes progressive falling apart so to speak, when you describe them individually, and in the amount of detail done in the linked example, you actually end up conveying less. In a way, brevity is lost. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell|talk]]) 23:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
== Genre ==
|