Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstract State Machine Language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
!vote keep |
||
Line 10:
::I do agree with '''keep,''' I think there are enough sources exists and those be ok to maintain article as stub. [[User:Jawad Haqbeen|Jawad Haqbeen]] ([[User talk:Jawad Haqbeen|talk]]) 02:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 06:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Abstract State Machine Language]]</noinclude></p>
*'''Keep.''' A quick search shows that there are many sources on this topic. There's nothing wrong with stubs. ―[[User:Jochem van Hees|Jochem van Hees]] ([[User talk:Jochem van Hees|talk]]) 11:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
|