Content deleted Content added
→See also: use Annotated Link to get short descriptions (some of which need to be added) |
→Intuition: minor changes in spelling and prepositions |
||
Line 10:
Ordinary linear regression predicts the [[expected value]] of a given unknown quantity (the ''response variable'', a [[random variable]]) as a [[linear combination]] of a set of observed values (''predictors''). This implies that a constant change in a predictor leads to a constant change in the response variable (i.e. a ''linear-response model''). This is appropriate when the response variable can vary, to a good approximation, indefinitely in either direction, or more generally for any quantity that only varies by a relatively small amount compared to the variation in the predictive variables, e.g. human heights.
However, these assumptions are inappropriate for some types of response variables. For example, in cases where the response variable is expected to be always positive and varying over a wide range, constant input changes lead to geometrically (i.e. exponentially) varying, rather than constantly varying, output changes. As an example, suppose a linear prediction model learns from some data (perhaps primarily drawn from large beaches) that a 10 degree temperature decrease would lead to 1,000 fewer people visiting the beach. This model is unlikely to generalize well over different sized beaches. More specifically, the problem is that if you use the model to predict the new attendance with a temperature drop of 10 for a beach that regularly receives 50 beachgoers, you would predict an impossible attendance value of −950. Logically, a more realistic model would instead predict a constant ''rate'' of increased beach attendance (e.g. an increase
Similarly, a model that predicts a probability of making a yes/no choice (a [[Bernoulli distribution|Bernoulli variable]]) is even less suitable as a linear-response model, since probabilities are bounded on both ends (they must be between 0 and 1). Imagine, for example, a model that predicts the likelihood of a given person going to the beach as a function of temperature. A reasonable model might predict, for example, that a change in 10 degrees makes a person two times more or less likely to go to the beach. But what does "twice as likely" mean in terms of a probability? It cannot literally mean to double the probability value (e.g. 50% becomes 100%, 75% becomes 150%, etc.). Rather, it is the ''[[odds ratio|odds]]'' that are doubling: from 2:1 odds, to 4:1 odds, to 8:1 odds, etc. Such a model is a ''log-odds or [[Logistic regression|logistic]] model''.
Generalized linear models cover all these situations by allowing for response variables that have arbitrary distributions (rather than simply [[normal distribution]]s), and for an arbitrary function of the response variable (the ''link function'') to vary linearly with the predictors (rather than assuming that the response itself must vary linearly). For example, the case above of predicted number of beach attendees would typically be modeled with a [[Poisson distribution]] and a log link, while the case of predicted probability of beach attendance would typically be
==Overview==
| |||