Comparison of IPv6 support in common applications: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
How in the world can I describe this edit?
Remove non-pertinent examples lacking an English Wikipedia article
Line 5:
|-
!Application!!OS!!Version!!IPv6 Support!!Notes
|-
|AB Tutor
|[[microsoft Windows|Windows]]
|7+
|{{yes}}
|
|-
|[[Android Studio]]
|[[Microsoft Windows|Windows]]
|
|{{no}}
Line 94 ⟶ 88:
|1.2.5+
|{{Yes}}
|-
|PaperCut
|Windows
|All
|{{partial}}
|The PaperCut client supports IPv6 only networks where the IPv4 stack is not bound to a [[network adapter]], however it will crash if the IPv4 stack is uninstalled. The PaperCut printer port does not support IPv6.
|-
|Planet eStream
|Windows
|Tested with v6.10.05.10+
|{{partial}}
|The bulk of Planet eStream works perfectly over IPv6. The main feature that doesn't work is [[streaming video]]. Video playback will fall back to [[HTTP]] over IPv6 and users can't [[livestreaming|stream live]] from the encoder application, although it will upload recorded videos (a special IPv6 build of the encoder was provided/unsure if this is generally available at the moment). TV [[livestreaming]] over IPv6 is not functional.
|-
|[[PuTTY]]