Talk:Boxing (computer programming): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 84:
 
[[:Object type (object-oriented programming)]] → {{no redirect|Boxing (computer science)}} – The current title is just terrible, it is nowhere in the article and has no sources using the term. Looking at incoming links they are either from the data types template under "related topics", or to the sections boxing or autoboxing. Looking at [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/redirectviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&page=Object%20type%20(object-oriented%20programming)] the redirect [[Boxing (computer science)]] gets 62 pageviews by itself compared to the this page's 250, out of a total 406. Boxing adequately describes the article; unboxing and autoboxing are derived terms so in the interest of concision do not need to be in the title. [[User:Mathnerd314159|Mathnerd314159]] ([[User talk:Mathnerd314159|talk]]) 21:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
*'''Support''', boxing is the established term. "Object type" refers to any type that can contain or refer to an object so it's a misleading term. [[User:JIP|<span style="color: #CC0000;">J</span><span style="color: #00CC00;">I</span><span style="color: #0000CC;">P</span>]] &#124; [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 08:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)