Content deleted Content added
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m +{{Authority control}} (2 IDs from Wikidata), WP:GenFixes on |
m Removing link(s) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Lindsay (apologist) (3rd nomination) closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
Line 68:
==Criticism==
Some critics believe that certain subjects suffer from a lack of daily exposure to subject matter and practice that occurs with an A/B block schedule. Courses like mathematics, foreign languages, and music may benefit from daily practice and suffer from a lack thereof.<ref name="Lindsay">[http://www.jefflindsay.com/Block3.shtml "The Case Against Block Scheduling"] by
A [[University of Virginia]] study of 8,000 college students found that students who had block scheduling in [[high school]] performed worse in university science courses.<ref name="Tai">[http://www.virginia.edu/insideuva/2006/08/block_scheduling.html "Block scheduling: Not helping high school students perform better in college science"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080123143800/http://www.virginia.edu/insideuva/2006/08/block_scheduling.html |date=January 23, 2008 }} by [[Robert Tai]]</ref>
|