Talk:Interpreter (computing): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 131.119.15.14 - "First sentence is misleading"
Line 187:
 
== Not satisfied with first sentence ==
The first sentence makes it sound as if instructionsthe areCPU beingis executedexecuting instructions that haven't been compiled into machine language., Theand instructionsthat's referredimpossible. toThe hereCPU areis beingonly readexecuting andthe followedinterpreter. by theThe interpreter process, notrunning in the CPU., Thereads CPUand executesmaps the interpreter, not the "instructions" referredcode to here.compiled routines Therewithin arethe interpreter, instructionsthus (source code) and CPU instructionscalling/executing (machine code). Yes, sourceSource code is usually compiled into machine code, but that's not the scenario when running an interpreter. With <!--an Template:Unsignedinterpreter IPit --><smallis class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/131mapped.119.15.14|131.119.15.14]] ([[User talk:131.119.15.14#top|talk]]) 15:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->