Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of layout engines (CSS): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:29, 25 February 2007

Revision as of 00:29, 25 February 2007

Line 6:

*'''Delete''' - there are plenty of third-party sites doing a much better job of describing this kind of thing. [[User:Nssdfdsfds|Nssdfdsfds]] 13:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

**'''Comment''' - If there are "plenty of third-party sites doing a much better job [...]", why don't you list them so they provide as [[WP:RS]]? I dispute this argument as being contradictory. For the other part of the quote, see below. --[[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

***There are links at the bottom of the page, which are primary sources of their author's own original research. This page cannot hope to keep up. I don't believe that "westciv.com" is a reliable source as to the CSS specification laid down by the World Wide Web Consortium and as actually implemented by say Mozilla. [[User:Nssdfdsfds|Nssdfdsfds]] 00:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' - This is not a "bug list". This article seeks to give an overview over which parts of the specifications are supported by each browser and if not, say so and provide a source detailing the problem. This is not OR. Sources are provided for the most part, and if not, should be added. So instead of deleting the article, we should add sources and remove parts that are OR. --[[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

**It sure looks like a bug list to me - it's concerned with detailing non-compliance with a spec. I also can't see that it's practicable to source all the statements contained in the article (there are hundreds). [[User:Nssdfdsfds|Nssdfdsfds]] 00:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)