Content deleted Content added
Yulia Romero (talk | contribs) →Split proposed: I am afraid not a good idea now... |
ManfredHugh (talk | contribs) →Split proposed: Reply |
||
Line 35:
The history section of this article is [[WP:LENGTH|long]] enough to merit its own article. See also German-language article: [[de:Geschichte der Stadt Dnipro|History of Dnipro (city)]]. Thoughts? -- [[User:M2545|M2545]] ([[User talk:M2545|talk]]) 10:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|M2545}} I took out the political stuff (election results and famous politicians who were involved in national politics etc.) from the history section of this article the last days and placed this in [[Dnipro#Politics]]. I did this because looking at the Wikipedia articles [[History of London]] and [[History of Berlin]] this kind of information does not belong in the history section of a Wikipedia article about a city... Is in your opinion the history section of this article still [[WP:LENGTH|long]] enough to merit its own article? I am afraid not, and is afraid that a [[History of Dnipro]] will be nothing but only a slightly longer version then the history section of this article. — '''[[User:Yulia Romero|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Yulia Romero</span>]]''' • [[User_talk:Yulia Romero|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 21:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
::<nowiki>I agree. unless there is to be substantial new material there is no cause for a separate history page.~~~</nowiki> [[User:ManfredHugh|ManfredHugh]] ([[User talk:ManfredHugh|talk]]) 09:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
| |||