Revision as of 10:14, 25 February 2007 edit Ratarsed (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,484 edits m Delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:53, 25 February 2007 edit undo El T (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 923 edits Keep Next edit →
Line 20: '''Delete''' per nomination; In addition, Whilst I could see this would be a great resource for web developers if it was sourced, I don't see this as being able to follow the precedent of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of web browsers]] -- If someone is prepared to go and cite each case, then they should at least remove the sections for which the W3 hasn't at least got to 'Candidate Recommendation' status without a thumping great warning. I also don't think that browser proprietary extensions should be listed at all (all those starting with a '-'). -- [[User:Ratarsed\|Ratarsed]] 10:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC) '''Keep''' - as noted above, see why [[Comparison of web browsers]] was kept. Yes, the article has issues in terms of sourcing, size, and the inclusion of unfinalised specs. But they can be fixed (except perhaps page size), and the strengths of the page are very substantial. [[User:El T\|El T]] 13:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of layout engines (CSS): Difference between revisions