MediaWiki talk:Common.js/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Fluxbot (talk | contribs)
m Obsolete HTML tags "tt" swapped out for "samp" or "code", "font" changed to "span style". Project Lint
Line 76:
:: Hmm.. it breaks the wikilinks. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 22:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:::Please discuss things here before implementing them, if you are 99.99% sure, and it is uploaded to 100,000 people then statistically you are messing up 10 people. Better that 10 or 20 people become 99.99% sure. [[User talk:H|<small><sup><fontspan colorstyle="color: #000">(</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color: #c20">H</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color: #000">)</fontspan></sup></small>]]<!-- Was HighInBC --> 22:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63306316516" ></span>
== Overriding automatic deletion summaries for attack pages ==
Line 151:
This may be obvious to some, but others seem to find it difficult to know what this article is all about. Perhaps it would be handy to place a comment near the top of these messages spelling out that one should view it's source and past the contents into the MediaWiki:Common.js article/message at your mediawiki site. I can tell you that I felt a little dumb having spent a few days figuring out something this obvious which a simple comment might have told me. --[[User:D0li0|D0li0]] 22:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 
:Likewise I feel dumb for not understanding anything you just said. —<ttsamp>'''[[special:contributions/freakofnurture|freak]]([[w:en:user talk:freakofnurture|talk]])'''</ttsamp> 22:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 
:This JavaScript code is not meant for installing on other sites. It is purpose-specific to English Wikipedia. What made you think that this is something you should install on another MediaWiki site? If there is something on the site leading people to think this code is ready-made for installation on other sites, it needs to be fixed. [[User talk:Mike Dillon|Mike Dillon]] 21:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Line 179:
::*
::: I'd agree if this was something in the content-area (which could easily lead to an almost infinite number of CSS stylings) but I consider this link part of the MediaWiki-interface (which are quite finite in their number). Using CSS ''might'' have a (likely negligible) performance benefit, under the assumption the CSS class can be assigned to the element before it is added to the document tree. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 20:29, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
::::Well, if the code was moved into say MainPage.js… but since it's still here — okay, let it be CSS, since CSS ''there'' takes less space than Javascript ''here''. P.S. Don't forget that 'interwiki-completelist' is going to be <ttcode>id</ttcode> now, not <ttcode>class</ttcode> ∴ [[User:Alex Smotrov|Alex Smotrov]] 22:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63308276156" ></span>
== CSD Script ==