Revision as of 19:33, 25 February 2007 edit Johnn 7 (talk \| contribs) 531 edits →[[Secret Service codenames]] ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:03, 25 February 2007 edit undo DXRAW (talk \| contribs) 3,398 edits →[[Secret Service codenames]] Next edit →
Line 11: '''Comment''' The source that is being used lists a [[Spooks\|TV Program]] codename for [[Queen Elizabeth II]] That shows how it does not pass [[WP:RS]] [[User:DXRAW\|DXRAW]] 23:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC) '''Comment''' I believe the discussion here is about whether this is encyclopedic or not. If it is poorly sourced, that should be fixed, but it isn't a critera for deletion. [[User:Johnn 7\|Johnn 7]] 19:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC) *'''Comment''' The point i'm trying to make is that it the sources is incorrect and thus should be removed leaving something which is unsourced and also thus leaving nothing there so in a nutshell there is no article. [[User:DXRAW\|DXRAW]] 20:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Service codenames: Difference between revisions