Content deleted Content added
→Prolog: new section |
|||
Line 12:
[[Language-oriented programming]] does appear to be related to, or the same as [[Grammar-oriented_programming]]. I'm researching the literature on this topic and related, I'll look into it. [[User:David D Allen|David D Allen]] ([[User talk:David D Allen|talk]]) 18:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
== Prolog ==
I am missing prolog in this category. Actually prolog modules like clpfd, chr and dcg can be seen as syntax extensions and they are mixable which is very strong. It is even mixable with a bigger language project namely logtalk which is also a language on top of prolog. I am not 100% sure but I think the racket languages cannot bi mixed so easily. I wish someone can prove me wrong. [[Special:Contributions/95.91.243.156|95.91.243.156]] ([[User talk:95.91.243.156|talk]]) 21:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
|