Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladies Learning Code: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 11:
I am always conflicted when I list for deletion articles on excellent projects such as this -- they generally deserve to become notable , and I do share the feeling that perhaps an appropriate part of our role is to help them. But it isn't: we're not a directory, not even a directory of everything good that is in some way related to our own initiatives. I tend to deal with it by letting pass the ones that are written as real articles, rather than collections of buzzwords, and focussing on the ones like this where every major contributor is a single purpose account. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 05:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep''' I wouldn't consider the Toronto Sun terribly reliable. I have one story on the CBC [https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/ladies-learning-code-1.4021155] about the group, one brief mention in the Toronto Star [https://www.thestar.com/business/2016/12/05/trudeau-joins-campaign-encouraging-youth-to-study-computer-science.html], but this is a bit more about the lady that founded it [https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2022/07/02/this-toronto-entrepreneur-knows-the-code-to-cool-spots-in-the-city.html]. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 15:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
: Could also redirect to Canada Learning Code, but that article doesn't seem to exist. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 15:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
| |||