Content deleted Content added
m v2.04b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9:
One of the foundational problems of extremal graph theory, dating to work of Mantel in 1907 and [[Turán's theorem|Turán]] from the 1940s, asks to characterize those graphs that do not contain a copy of some fixed [[forbidden subgraph problem|forbidden]] {{math|''H''}} as a subgraph. In a different ___domain, one of the motivating questions in additive combinatorics is understanding how large a set of integers can be without containing a {{math|''k''}}-term [[arithmetic progression]], with upper bounds on this size given by [[Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions|Roth]] (<math>k=3</math>) and [[Szemerédi's theorem|Szemerédi]] (general {{math|''k''}}).
The method of containers (in graphs) was initially pioneered by Kleitman and Winston in 1980, who bounded the number of lattices
A generalization of these ideas to a hypergraph container lemma was devised independently by Saxton and Thomason<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Saxton |first1=David |last2=Thomason |first2=Andrew |title=Hypergraph containers |journal=Inventiones Mathematicae |date=2015 |volume=201 |issue=3 |pages=925–992|doi=10.1007/s00222-014-0562-8 |arxiv=1204.6595 |bibcode=2015InMat.201..925S |s2cid=119253715 }}</ref> and Balogh, Morris, and Samotij<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Balogh |first1= József |last2=Morris |first2=Robert|last3=Samotij|first3=Wojciech |title=Independent sets in hypergraphs |journal=Journal of the American Mathematical Society |date=2015 |volume=28 |issue= 3 |pages=669–709|doi= 10.1090/S0894-0347-2014-00816-X |s2cid= 15244650 }}</ref> in 2015, inspired by a variety of previous related work.
==Main idea and informal statement==
Many problems in combinatorics can be recast as questions about independent sets in graphs and hypergraphs. For example, suppose we wish to understand subsets of integers {{math|''1''}} to {{math|''n''}}, which we denote by <math>[n]</math> that lack a {{math|''k''}}-term arithmetic progression. These sets are exactly the independent sets in the {{math|''k''}}-uniform hypergraph <math> H = (\{1,2,\ldots,n\}, E) </math>, where {{math|''E''}} is the collection of all {{math|''k''}}-term arithmetic progressions in <math> \{1,2,\ldots,n\} </math>.
In the above (and many other) instances, there are usually two natural classes of problems posed about a hypergraph {{math|''H''}}:
* What is the size of a maximum independent set in {{math|''H''}}? What does the collection of maximum-sized independent sets in {{math|''H''}} look like?
* How may independent sets does {{math|''H''}} have? What does a "typical" independent set in {{math|''H''}} look like?
|