Scaled agile framework: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation doesn't say anything about "development teams will still get into detailed refinement 2-3 iterations ahead", replaced with citation needed
The citation is about proposing principles for Scaled Agile, it does not support that "SAFe delivers many of the same principles" and does not mention cross-functional teams. Replaced with citation needed. Also moved a criticism to a more suitable section.
Line 18:
 
=== Keeping agile at abstract levels of responsibility ===
While development teams have a number of frameworks that define how they should be agile, there is very little that describes this for management. SAFe delivers many of the same principles, such as cross-functional teams, to the groups that handle the more abstract levels of responsibility and planning (product and portfolio).<ref>{{Cite book|title=Characteristics and Principles of Scaled Agile|last=Laanti|first=M|work=XP 2014 Workshops|publisher=Springer International Publishing|year=2014cn}}</ref> SAFe has also been criticized for aggregating too many disparate practices.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.infoq.com/news/2013/08/safe|title=Has SAFe Cracked the Large Agile Adoption Nut?|last=Elssamadisy|first=Amr|website=InfoQ|access-date=2017-11-11}}</ref>
 
=== Dealing with delegated authority ===
Line 44:
#[[Decentralization|Decentralize]] decision-making
# Organize around value
 
SAFe has been criticized for aggregating too many disparate practices.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.infoq.com/news/2013/08/safe|title=Has SAFe Cracked the Large Agile Adoption Nut?|last=Elssamadisy|first=Amr|website=InfoQ|access-date=2017-11-11}}</ref>
 
=== The SAFe framework ===